
Snail mail: Royal Mail still faces significant challenges despite getting longer to deliver letters
The last few months have been busy for Royal Mail. In late April, Czech businessman Daniel Kretinsky’s EP Group acquired its parent company, International Distribution Services, for £3.6 billion – a value well below the May 2021 peak of £6 billion.
Then, regulator Ofcom announced there would be changes to a regulatory framework called the universal service obligation (USO). This effectively determines delivery standards for Royal Mail – and has been seen as a major barrier to profitability.
The company, which was privatised in 2013, made an adjusted operating loss of £348 million in 2023-24. That followed a loss of £419 million in 2022-23.
So what do the events of the past few months mean for its future?
It has seen letter volumes fall from a peak of 20 billion in 2004-5 to only 6.6 billion in 2023-24. At the same time, parcel volumes have grown to 3.9 billion – driven by a rise in home shopping.
However, Royal Mail has struggled to manage this shift and maintain profitability, effectively downsizing letter infrastructure and rebalancing its workforce to reflect this.
Why is Royal Mail at a disadvantage?
Meanwhile, the costs of meeting its USO obligations have meant its performance has deteriorated. There is competition in letters – but only for the most profitable business.
Delivery company Whistl collects and processes bulk business mail and pays Royal Mail to deliver “the last mile”. But Whistl sits outside the USO and can cherry-pick its market segment.
The new USO – which came into effect on 28th July, 2025 – still requires Royal Mail to deliver first-class letters six days a week, but second-class deliveries will now be on alternate weekdays only. Parcel deliveries are five days a week.
Crucially, the obligation applies to around 32 million UK addresses – all for the same price.
How are Royal Mail delivery targets changing?
The target for delivering first-class post within one day is falling from 93.5 per cent to 90 per cent. For second-class, the three-day target is falling from 98.5 per cent to 95 per cent.
There’s also a new target – 99 per cent of all post must arrive no more than two days late.
In making these changes, Ofcom is seeking to strike a balance between reliability, affordability, and sustainability.
It believes the changes will save Royal Mail between £250 million and £425 million a year, ensuring the service will break even and continue.
Will new delivery targets help Royal Mail?
However, the company’s 2024-25 performance is below the new targets (76.5 per cent for first-class and 92.2 per cent for second class).
As such, it’s likely to face more fines from Ofcom to add to those totalling £16 million for the previous two years.
In addition, its ability to increase revenue by raising prices might be curtailed. Second-class prices are regulated, with increases linked to affordability and inflation.
They have risen by 74 per cent since 2013, while first-class prices are unregulated and increased by 183 per cent. By comparison, inflation over the same period was just 40 per cent.
Ofcom has said it may also regulate first-class costs, amid concerns that Royal Mail may raise them to such a level that demand disappears, leaving only second-class post.
Why Royal Mail needs to change
Despite growth, Royal Mail’s parcels business faces headwinds. Its market share fell from 45 per cent in 2014-15 to 35 per cent in 2023-24.
Competitors, including FedEx, DHL, Evri, DPD and Amazon are not encumbered by USO obligations. This means they can be leaner and more aggressive in their pricing.
Evri and DHL Ecommerce UK recently announced a merger, which is awaiting approval by the Competition and Markets Authority. If the regulator approves that deal, it could create a company delivering more than a billion parcels every year.
In addition to modernising sorting offices, Royal Mail will quickly need to adopt technology such as smart postboxes and parcel lockers in order to compete – but for now it is well behind.
A recent contract with supermarket Sainsbury’s to expand its network of lockers to the stores is a good start. However, Royal Mail has only around 1,900 lockers (and 1,200 parcel postboxes) compared to Amazon’s 5,000 lockers and Inpost’s 7,500.
Does Royal Mail need more freedom to succeed?
The impact of the EP Group takeover may take some time to be realised. The guarantees given to the government and unions to get the deal done will limit the extent of change for the first few years.
Key assurances include maintaining the USO (whatever form that might take) and regulatory compliance, as well as keeping headquarters and tax residency in the UK.
On top of this, it must also protect the brand, reinvest any pension surplus into Royal Mail, and it cannot sell off or break up the company, outsource services or make compulsory redundancies.
These legally binding commitments, supported by a government “golden share” with some veto powers, are not open-ended.
Most are valid for five years, but the agreement of no compulsory redundancies was originally valid only until 2025.
What happens after these commitments expire is uncertain, but the business has to change significantly.
How can Daniel Kretinsky modernise Royal Mail?
Kretinsky has spoken of the need to modernise to keep pace with competitors. This means there will have to be significant change – sooner rather than later.
Improving productivity will be key, and that is very likely to mean redundancies and changes to work practices.
Royal Mail’s management faced a series of damaging strikes in 2022 and 2023. However, Kretinsky has sought to work with unions, principally the Communication Workers Union.
He has reached a three-year pay deal with greater job security, but efficiency needs to be improved if Royal Mail is to become profitable – and in a labour-intensive business that could mean difficult decisions and fewer employees.
What Royal Mail has in its favour however is its status as a trusted brand (although recent delivery performance may have tarnished that in some customers’ eyes).
Changes to the USO will help in the short term. But the volume of letters will continue to fall and the company’s success will still depend on its ability to match capacity with demand while achieving its targets.
Further USO changes are inevitable. And so is the demise of first-class post, as price increases render it a low-volume, uneconomic service. The takeover is likely to accelerate change.
The parcels business will probably become an integral part of a pan-European logistics enterprise, alongside EP’s existing ventures and Royal Mail’s sister firm, parcel company GLS.
This inevitably leaves the letters side of the company as a much smaller offering – with a very uncertain future.
Further reading:
What is the secret to Walmart's success?
Multidexterity: How Lego and Netflix achieved digital success
Mergers and acquisitions: Four steps to deliver value
Do Taylor Swift and Amazon have similar strategies for success?
Paul Simmonds is a Fellow specialising in Strategy and International Business. He embarked on an academic career after completing a PhD in Strategic Management at Warwick Business School.
Master strategic agility, resilience, and frameworks that support innovation and decision-making on the four day programme The Strategic Mindset of Leadership at at WBS London at The Shard.
Discover more about Strategy and Organisational Change. Receive our Core Insights newsletter via email or LinkedIn.