Three lessons for start-ups from Quibi's failure
01 December 2020
By Christian Stadler
It took Quibi just six months to fail. Not quite the Hollywood ending the glitzy short-content streaming service had been dreaming of, but suitably short.
Founders Meg Whitman, a former eBay and HP CEO, and Jeffrey Katzenberg, a former Disney executive and DreamWorks co-founder, managed to raise $1.75 billion, sign up A-list actors and had initial success attracting advertisers. The only thing missing: subscribers.
Announcing the closing down of the service, Whitman and Katzenberg offered an explanation: “Quibi is not succeeding. Likely for one of two reasons: because the idea itself wasn’t strong enough to justify a standalone streaming service or because of our timing.
“Unfortunately, we will never know, but we suspect it’s been a combination of the two.”
They are wrong. Timing was not the issue here. Katzenberg has previously suggested that people staying at home due to COVID-19 opt for streaming on their TV rather than quick bites on their mobile. But US consumers also spent more time using mobile video apps during the pandemic. So the timing was actually right.
Let’s focus on what really went wrong and the strategic lessons other start-ups can draw from this.
1 Don’t get stuck in the middle
Quibi had a classic stuck-in-the-middle problem. You get better premium content on Netflix or HBO and more addictive free content on TikTok.
The danger is that a perceived niche market is only superficially different from what’s already on offer. If that’s the case, a company is not avoiding competition but is instead under attack from multiple angles.
That’s what happened in Quibi’s case. Offering a paid-for premium service automatically put them in competition with Netflix, HBO, Disney+ and Apple TV. The idea that the length of the episodes set them apart was always an illusion. Even more so, as the split-up of longer films into chapters sometimes felt arbitrary. Consumers might as well have pressed pause on a Netflix movie and returned later.
At the same time the rise of TikTok and the continuing growth of YouTube put pressure on Quibi from the opposite end of the market. Why pay for a service when you have access to wildly entertaining bite-sized videos for free?
For start-ups the lesson is clear: creating a new niche market is great, but make sure it really is a distinct market.
2 Don’t trust your experience (too much)
Quibi made some pretty big assumptions: (1) consumers want short 10-minute videos to fill in-between moments, (2) A-list Hollywood stars will attract subscribers, and (3) spending heavily on marketing will build momentum.
All three assumptions were wrong. As the success of ‘Tiger King’ showed, people are happy to spend considerable time on content they enjoy. Older executives might think that Jennifer Lopez, Idris Elba and Kiefer Sutherland will pull in young audiences, but they don’t. And marketing buys you initial attention, but true momentum can only be built if you offer must-watch content - which was not the case.
Almost 10 years ago Eric Ries popularised the lean start-up method. Instead of developing a detailed business model, its best to test your assumptions and ideas quickly and cheaply. You experiment until you find a product or service that truly entices your customers.
Quibi should have done this too, but the founders’ experience was working against them. They had strong convictions how this industry worked. That’s hardly a surprise for seasoned executives. Ideas that do not fit with these assumptions were easily discarded.
The second insight from Quibi’s failure is obvious: start-ups are well advised to take a trial-and-error approach rather than making strong experience-driven assumptions early on.
3 Be smart about building momentum
Scaling up is a crucial moment for every start-up. Quibi had capital (a lot of it) and understood that content and marketing would determine whether it was able to build momentum. How they went about this, however, was wrong.
Quibi invested heavily in content. For the top tier of its short-form series it spent about $100,000 per minute, a total of $1.1 billion in its first year. But the shows were simply not good enough. Some of them were okay, but none were a real hit, drawing in viewers. Most of the shows seemed to mimic the style of more prestigious ones on HBO.
The general impression was that top products were going elsewhere. On top of this, Quibi was just leasing the productions, greatly reducing its long-term options to make money.
Quibi also invested heavily in marketing. A total of $400 million according to research firm Apptopia. At the same time Quibi forced a social media black-out. Users were not allowed to share videos on social media, initially not even screenshots. In contrast to other new streaming platforms Quibi did not facilitate word-of-mouth when the Los Angeles-based firm needed it most.
Start-ups have to be particularly smart about building momentum as they can’t rely on existing distribution channels. That means their product and marketing has to fit the market they target (that’s strategy 101, but sometimes the fundamentals are forgotten). In Quibi’s case this would have been investment in content development together with influencers that those most likely to subscribe care about.
The last lesson from Quibi’s fall: start-ups need to remember they have to build momentum and can’t follow the capital intensive marketing approach an incumbent would take.
Start-ups should take Quibi’s failure as a learning opportunity
The beauty about failures such as Quibi is that they offer great lessons to others.
The obsession with niche markets can easily draw companies into all-round competition, past experience creates the wrong impression to know what matters, and vast amounts of capital make start-ups forget that they are not incumbents. So, no need to fall into these traps again.
This article is republished from Forbes.
Follow Christian Stadler on Twitter @EnduringSuccess.
For more articles on Entrepreneurship & Innovation sign up to Core Insights here.